Article. Services. PubMed. REPLY. Biliary Sludge. 19 October 1999 | Volume 131 Issue 8 | Page 631. IN RESPONSE. We thank the readers for their insightful and constructive comments on our review. _
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/131/8/631
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [2]
endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in small-sized pancreatic islet cell tumorssonograms obtained by extracorporeal ultrasonography (US) and EUS EUS was superior to US in accurately _
http://www.jultrasoundmed.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/5/271
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [0]
Author. Keyword(s) Vol Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)introduced into gastroenterological diagnostics more than 20 years ago the role of high-frequency US probe sonography in an American population _
http://gut.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/52/8/1220
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [0]
MR) imaging results with pathologic and endoscopic ultrasonographic (US) results when available Brensinger CMKochman ML. EUS predictors of long-term survival in esophageal _
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/230/1/281
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [1]
spreadvascular invasion). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is able to produce b> Intraductal US was compared with conventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed _
http://www.medscape.com/content/1999/00/43/28/432870/432870.xml
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [0]
Author. Keyword(s) Vol Endoluminal or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was first attempted in 1957 by Wild and Reid who placed a of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic us and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991 _
http://thorax.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/55/12/983
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [0]
f6\fs20 :218-22.\line Abstract: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was evaluated in the diagnosis of gastric cance r: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT [see comments _
http://www.endosonography.dk/Workshop/LUSreferences.rtf
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [3]
Finallywhen EUS is combined with its sister endoscopic proceduretherapeutic ERCPit results in a had CT or US guided pancreatic biopsy than with EUS-FNA (82). Clinically _
http://www.pancreasfoundation.org/Docs/erickson_capecod.doc
Rating: [0.00] Votes: [0]
Hits: [0]